Scenario Planning Workspace
Reallocate NIL and house pools, queue contract moves, and simulate shocks before locking decisions.
Available NIL
$5,421,480
Available House
$1,616,631
NIL Pool
Total Cap
$8,500,000
Committed
$3,078,520
Projected
$6,229,426
Available
$5,421,480
House Profit
Total Pool
$2,250,000
Committed
$633,369
Projected
$773,281
Available
$1,616,631
Planning Guidelines
NIL Capacity
$8,500,000
NIL Committed
$3,078,520
NIL Available
$5,421,480
House Capacity
$2,250,000
House Available
$1,616,631
Last Export
2025-12-07T18:56:03.732171Z
Alerts & Flags
- Projected NIL offers exceed 45% of remaining capacity. Prioritize top targets.
- WR is tracking under target share. Rebalance attention.
- OL is tracking under target share. Rebalance attention.
- QB is tracking under target share. Rebalance attention.
- RB is tracking under target share. Rebalance attention.
- TE is tracking under target share. Rebalance attention.
Scenario Details
Retention First
retention-firstProtect current roster by extending top NIL earners and deferring lower ROI deals.
- Extend top 5 ROI roster contracts by 15%
- Convert volatile contracts to incentive-based payouts
- Allocate 20% of available NIL to retention bonuses
Contract Move Composer
Queued Moves
Contracts to Flex
-
Seed: Zachary Rodriguez WR • Fit 83$258,873Extend
-
Seed: Donald Anderson WR • Fit 94$244,310Extend
-
Seed: Anthony Moore RB • Fit 89$236,105Extend
-
Seed: Anthony Gonzalez TE • Fit 92$234,480Extend
-
Seed: Ryan Taylor WR • Fit 82$231,381Extend
-
Seed: Christopher Sanchez QB • Fit 77$226,169Extend
-
Seed: Robert Thomas OL • Fit 84$223,597Extend
-
Jackson Reed QB • Fit 82$222,076Extend
-
Seed: Alexander Moore OL • Fit 92$220,356Extend
-
Antonio Garcia WR • Fit 84$217,213Extend
-
Blake Anderson OL • Fit 85$207,972Extend
-
Seed: Alexander Miller OL • Fit 80$187,757Extend
Priority Prospects
-
Seed: Tyler Jackson WR • Offered$166,43972% • Aggressive
-
Seed: William Lewis QB • Offered$153,71072% • Aggressive
-
Seed: James Jones WR • Offered$133,51372% • Aggressive
-
Mason Perry WR • Offered$130,37672% • Aggressive
-
Terrell Jackson DL • Offered$120,66472% • Aggressive
-
Jaylen Brown RB • Offered$119,51272% • Aggressive
-
Kai Tanaka OL • Offered$119,26872% • Aggressive
-
Seed: Justin Sanchez RB • Offered$116,58772% • Aggressive
-
Seed: Michael Sanchez QB • Visiting$132,89758% • Defensive
-
Seed: Christopher Harris QB • Visiting$132,53158% • Defensive
-
Seed: Brian White QB • Visiting$123,57358% • Steady
-
Seed: Nicholas Thompson QB • Visiting$122,06758% • Defensive
Scenario Stacks
Stress Tests
Applied shocks: 0-
QB Transfer Portal Shock Assume starting QB departs, requiring emergency NIL outlay (+$650k) within 14 days.NIL impact: $-650,000 • House impact: $-120,000Resulting NIL available: $4,771,480 | House: $1,496,631
-
Top Prospect Flip Risk Competitor increases offer by $300k. Matching package needed to stay in play.NIL impact: $-300,000 • House impact: $-60,000Resulting NIL available: $5,121,480 | House: $1,556,631
-
Season-Ending Injury Cushion Reserve contingency fund to backfill injured starter via mid-season acquisition.NIL impact: $-210,000 • House impact: $-40,000Resulting NIL available: $5,211,480 | House: $1,576,631
KPI Watchlist
-
Roster Retention Burn Proportion of NIL pool already committed to roster contracts.36%Thresh 85% • Healthy
-
Recruiting Exposure Projected NIL required to land active prospects.73%Thresh 35% • Warning
-
House Profit Burn Share of house pool already allocated across roster.28%Thresh 90% • Healthy
Position Allocation Targets
| Position | Committed | Projected | Target % | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WR | $951,777 | $1,327,895 | 22.0% | Under |
| OL | $1,024,377 | $1,054,394 | 20.0% | Under |
| QB | $448,245 | $1,552,286 | 26.0% | Under |
| RB | $236,105 | $930,235 | 16.0% | Under |
| TE | $234,480 | $644,584 | 8.0% | Under |
| DL | $0 | $336,562 | 18.0% | Under |
| S | $183,535 | $73,686 | 8.0% | Under |
| CB | $0 | $193,670 | 12.0% | Under |
| LB | $0 | $116,115 | 10.0% | Under |
Scenario Track Comparison
Compare budget allocations across different scenario planning tracks